Download PDF Cartesian Reflections: Essays on Descartess Philosophy

Free download. Book file PDF easily for everyone and every device. You can download and read online Cartesian Reflections: Essays on Descartess Philosophy file PDF Book only if you are registered here. And also you can download or read online all Book PDF file that related with Cartesian Reflections: Essays on Descartess Philosophy book. Happy reading Cartesian Reflections: Essays on Descartess Philosophy Bookeveryone. Download file Free Book PDF Cartesian Reflections: Essays on Descartess Philosophy at Complete PDF Library. This Book have some digital formats such us :paperbook, ebook, kindle, epub, fb2 and another formats. Here is The CompletePDF Book Library. It's free to register here to get Book file PDF Cartesian Reflections: Essays on Descartess Philosophy Pocket Guide.

Create lists, bibliographies and reviews: or. Search WorldCat Find items in libraries near you.


  1. Anchorage, Fairbanks, and Everything In Between (Beer on the Last Frontier: The Craft Breweries of Alaska Book 2).
  2. Cartesian Reflections;
  3. Night of the Octopus!
  4. Two Rings: A Legacy of Hope.
  5. Descartes: Meditations on First Philosophy : With Selections from the Objections and Replies.
  6. Masters and Possessors of Nature - The New Atlantis.
  7. A discussion of the representation of gender in Virginia Woolfs novel To the Lighthouse /tagainst the background of Sherry Ortners theory;

Advanced Search Find a Library. Your list has reached the maximum number of items. Please create a new list with a new name; move some items to a new or existing list; or delete some items. Your request to send this item has been completed. APA 6th ed. Note: Citations are based on reference standards. However, formatting rules can vary widely between applications and fields of interest or study. The specific requirements or preferences of your reviewing publisher, classroom teacher, institution or organization should be applied.

The E-mail Address es field is required. Please enter recipient e-mail address es. The E-mail Address es you entered is are not in a valid format. Please re-enter recipient e-mail address es. You may send this item to up to five recipients.

The name field is required. Please enter your name. The E-mail message field is required. The method was to, in the first place, explore it by empirical observation. Look, but look carefully and systematically.

ISBN 10: 0199226970

To observe, however, is not to explain, and the new science seeks also to explain. Descartes has prepared the way for this. The former was already well known, but the sine law for refraction was newly discovered. Huygens was later to complain that Descartes had not referred to Snell, who is now generally credited with the discovery of this law. Descartes carefully shows how the lens of the eyeball, in conformity with the law of refraction, focuses light arriving from the object to form the image on the retina. The more particular biological facts of sight can be explained by the more general laws of geometrical optics.

The sine law of refraction is the general form of a set of laws: the angle of refraction will depend upon the particular transparent substances through which the light passes. The actual angle for any pair of substances will have to be determined by experiment. Notice the structure of these inferences.

There is a general law to the effect that for any situation of certain generic sort, there are specific laws that have some generic form. This is a law about laws. These two Principles provide a framework within which the scientist searching after truth works as he or she attempts to locate the law of the relevant generic sort that is there, according to theory, to be discovered. There will be a number of specific possibilities, each of the relevant generic sort. The un-eliminated hypothesis will be the specific law one is aiming to discover. In particular, such experiments will determine the constant of refraction that the sine law asserts to be there for specific pairs of transparent substances.

Experiment will confirm the un-eliminated specific hypothesis, and this will in turn confirm the more generic theory that predicted the existence of a law of that relevant form. The direction of the light rays as they pass from one substance to another will be determined not just by the constant of refraction, but also by the curvature of the surface that is the interface boundary.

Descartes shows how the shape of a lens contributes to the formation of images. This again is a generic description of the laws applying to many specific situations. Descartes applies this knowledge to account for the various effects that can be produced on the image on the retina, for example, by squeezing the eyeball to distort the lens of the eye in various ways. Descartes is using the knowledge of patterns not only to explain things newly noticed in observation, but also to apply it in ways useful to the further scientific exploration of the world telescopes and to make ordinary life better corrective lenses.

The laws about laws that are the laws of reflection and refraction are themselves laws of physics, laws of matter in motion. This kinship is not only one of shape but one of the generic form of the laws that describe the motions of these two sorts of entity. He assumes that the particles of light move in straight lines.

In the case of reflection he assumes that the light, that is, these light particles, strike an impenetrable surface and bounce off. In the case of the refraction he assumes the particles pass from a medium of one density to and through one with another density. The deductions Descartes offers are, in particular in the case of refraction, of questionable validity, but that is not to the present point; our interest is in the Cartesian method or methods and not how he actually applies them.

Descartes is clearly open to speculation because the model he uses for light is one that lacked empirical confirmation. He offered little evidence for his model of light. But it has two uses. One is as a heuristic device, to be used to discover laws, such as that of refraction, which can themselves be confirmed in experience.

The experimental confirmation of these specific laws will also confirm the laws of the generic theory that has been discovered by means of the heuristic model. He was clear, in his own mind at least, that the model had hardly be given a demonstration in the sense in which one could give in geometry the sort of demonstration given by Euclid.

Cartesian Reflections: Essays on Descartess Philosophy

He wrote to Mersenne:. You ask me whether I think what I have written about refraction is a demonstration. I think it is, at least as far as it is possible, without having proved the principles of physics previously by metaphysics, to give any demonstration in this subject But to demand that I should give geometrical demonstrations of matters which depend on physics is to demand that I should do the impossible.

Descartes' Meditations on First Philosophy

For, in such matters, one is satisfied that the writers, having presupposed certain things which are not obviously contradictory to experience, have besides argued, consistently and without logical fallacy, even if their assumptions are not exactly true. Many explained that sight occurred by immaterial sensory species, images of the objects being observed, being given off by those objects, and impinging upon the eye.


  1. Descartes: Meditations on First Philosophy: With Selections from the - Google книги;
  2. The Low-Maintenance Raised Bed Gardening Book - Everything you need to know to get Started Growing Your Own Vegetables from Garden Design to Dinner Table.
  3. Room Service (short story, body paint, rain, teasing).

The challenge was more or less that something like this must be so because no purely material explanation, in terms of particles interacting mechanically, could be given for the person becoming aware of the form of the object viewed. We need not pursue the line of the perceptual process from body into mind. It was based on dissection, mainly of animals, and some experiment, and a good deal of speculation.

John G. Cottingham's Documents - matanhepholyp.gq

Overall, it argued the thesis not only that the parts of the body are useful to the survival and good life of the animal or human being, but more strongly that the existence of these parts was to be explained by their utility--they existed in virtue of the fact that they contributed to the Good. While connected to the past, the cause of their existence was the form of the Good, their final cause, drawing them from the future into the present. While rejecting the anti-theological positions adopted by these latter Greek and Roman philosophers, Descartes sided with them in opposing teleological explanations.

To be sure, anatomy and physiological processes did contribute to the survival and well being of animals and human beings, but their explanation was entirely in terms of mechanistic causes.

John Cottingham - Cartesian Reflections: Essays On Descartess Philosophy: Torrent

That is, the science of human physiology is the same in kind as the science of stones. Descartes was prepared to extend his guess to the whole set of natural processes defining the human being save for rational thought and action under control of the conscious will. The complex mechanisms are assumed to be able to approximate those of a human, but as it is imagined as a machine we will not be tempted to attribute its motions to the various mysterious powers, vegetative and sensitive souls, and so on, as did Aristotle and the Scholastics.

The Description is a more curious work, dealing with the development of the human being from sperm through fetus to grown adult person.

It consists mainly of assertions and coarse sketches of the mechanisms supposed to be involved. Still, there were those who were not convinced. The English philosopher, Henry More, was one of these. He argued that the complexity of the human body and activity, indeed the complexity of plants and animals, could not be accounted for in terms of the bouncings and collisions of billiard balls of different sizes. Needless to say, these plastic forms were non-empirical entities.

The idea is with us still, with those who deny the inadequacy of natural selection to explain the origin of complex biological mechanisms. This was especially true of the Cartesian account of the development of the fetus: the passage of information from the sperm to the developing organs begged for the idea of an immaterial Form or final cause pulling the matter together into a whole unlike in any way its genetic antecedents.

More thought this way. He could not envision a more complicated physics, one that included the molecular biology of DNA molecules materially embodying the required information. A physics much more developed than Descartes and More could conceive, certainly much more than the levers and billiard balls and flowing fluids that formed the limits of their vision.

But while, in the end, physics went well beyond that limited Cartesian concept of the laws of physics to the laws of quantum mechanics and of molecular biology, these are still the laws of physics and it is still physics which forms the basic patterns of causation in physiology.